Hello,
I’m referring to this post:
May I ask whether you have still implemented the workaround for postbank.de? The problem still seems to exist and we are facing it too.
Thanks,
Winfried
Hello,
I’m referring to this post:
May I ask whether you have still implemented the workaround for postbank.de? The problem still seems to exist and we are facing it too.
Thanks,
Winfried
Hi Winfried, which problem exactly does still exist? Could you explain what the problem exactly is?
I have done some lookups:
PS C:\Windows\system32> nslookup postbank.de 1.1.1.1 Server: one.one.one.one Address: 1.1.1.1 Nicht autorisierende Antwort: Name: postbank.de Address: 160.83.8.182 PS C:\Windows\system32> nslookup postbank.de 8.8.8.8 Server: dns.google Address: 8.8.8.8 Nicht autorisierende Antwort: Name: postbank.de Address: 160.83.8.182
Both (1.1.1.1 & 8.8.8.8) resolve to the very same IP, which is correct and their webpage works for me aswell (with 1.1.1.1 as DNS)
which problem exactly
It still seems to be there on the authoritative DNS servers over at postbank.de. CF 1.1.1.1 implemented a workaround to fix it on their side:
In the meantime, we’ve disabled DNSSEC for the affected domain(s) until it’s resolved
There is no problem with 1.1.1.1 at the moment. My question was, is this workaround (“disabled DNSSEC for the affected domain(s)” ) still active within 1.1.1.1?
Winfried
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.